Why are chemical submission figures unreliable?
Chemical submission, which consists of administering psychoactive substances without the victims' knowledge, represents a growing scourge. However, the figures on this phenomenon remain unreliable, hampering the implementation of targeted actions. As actors engaged in this fight, we wish to shed light on the reasons for this imprecision while sharing our actions and solutions.
Underreporting: a major obstacle
Many victims are reluctant to report incidents of chemical submission, often out of fear of not being believed or because of a lack of clear memories. Stigma also plays a significant role. Caroline Darian, president of the association M'Endors Pas , emphasizes: "Shame and fear of judgment are major barriers to reporting."
Through our partnerships with M'Endors Pas and Balance Ton Bar , we have supported victims by providing them with screening tools and raising awareness through campaigns and articles. These actions aim to break the silence and encourage victims to file complaints.
Voluntary consumption or chemical submission?
GHB, ketamine and alcohol, which are frequently associated with chemical submission, are also used recreationally, which complicates the statistics. In some cases, it may be a state of chemical vulnerability resulting from voluntary consumption that exposes people to risks similar to chemical submission.
This is why we train the various stakeholders – companies, associations and event organisers – to react effectively in both cases , in order to guarantee maximum security and prevent any risk.
Problems with screening tests
Detecting GHB is particularly complex because of its rapid elimination by the body. Hair tests, which allow analysis up to several weeks after the event, remain difficult to access.
That is why we distribute tools such as the DrinkSafe Drug Detector® , which enables rapid and reliable detection of hazardous substances in drinks. At festivals and parties, we voluntarily run stands where we raise awareness among participants and offer them concrete solutions to protect themselves.
Committed figures: Caroline Darian and Gisèle Pélicot
The Mazan trial brought the scale of chemical submission to the media spotlight. Gisèle Pélicot, Caroline Darian's mother, played a key role. Her poignant testimony encouraged many victims to break their silence. In collaboration with various major players, we have increased prevention initiatives in party environments, distributing screening or detection tests, glass condoms or drink protectors such as anti-drug cup holders while investing in preventive and educational projects.
Our commitments against chemical submission
We have made the fight against chemical submission a priority. Through our actions, we actively contribute to protecting and raising awareness:
- Prevention in festive environments : volunteer stands at festivals, awareness campaigns on social networks and distribution of protection tools.
- Training : support for companies and associations in setting up screening campaigns, raising awareness of risky behavior and providing care to potential victims.
- Solidarity actions : donations of tests and writing of articles in support of associations such as M'Endors Pas and Balance Ton Bar .
Conclusion: an essential mobilization
The figures on chemical submission remain unclear due to many obstacles: under-reporting, testing limitations, or even legal disparities. However, thanks to the commitment of figures like Caroline Darian and Gisèle Pélicot, and to our actions on the ground, significant progress is possible.
Combating this scourge requires collective awareness, reliable tools and appropriate support for victims. Together, we can help make party environments safer and protect individuals from this insidious threat.
