Image d'article de blog Spray Kleaner Anti THC question

Study on the ineffectiveness of Kleaner Anti THC sprays: Saliva tests confirm the persistence of THC

Kleaner Spray Anti THC is attracting growing interest as a purported solution to removing THC from saliva, particularly in the context of driving under the influence of drugs. This product claims to work by deeply cleaning the mouth and capturing THC molecules thanks to its specific composition. However, its effectiveness sparks debate, with manufacturers' claims often contrasting with the opinions of toxicology experts and the results of scientific studies.

In this article, we will take a close look at the composition of Kleaner Spray Anti THC , as well as the available evidence regarding its actual effectiveness in removing THC from saliva.

Composition of an anti THC Kleaner Spray



The Kleaner Anti THC Spray consists of a series of ingredients whose action is supposed to eliminate traces of THC from saliva. In addition to food additives and stabilizers such as denatured alcohol, magnesium sulfate, potassium or sodium chloride, witch hazel and peppermint, neem extracts, xanthan gum or glycerin are included . These oily compounds are believed to have the ability to capture THC (cannabis) molecules present in saliva. However, experts, such as UCL toxicology professor Alfred Bernard and FNRS research director, express doubts about the effectiveness of these ingredients. THC (cannabis) , stored in fatty tissues, is slowly eliminated in regular smokers, making it difficult to extract with these compounds. Additionally, the amount of glycerin sprayed is considered too small to have a significant impact. In short, although these compounds can capture part of the THC molecules in saliva, their effectiveness in completely eliminating THC , especially present in fatty tissues, is questioned by experts.

Arguments against the effectiveness of Kleaner Spray Anti THC



Despite the manufacturers' claims, several elements call into question the real effectiveness of Kleaner Anti THC Spray . On the one hand, independent scientific studies, such as that carried out by researchers at the University of Santiago de Compostela, have revealed inconclusive results. This study compared the effect of mouth rinsing with water, whole milk and Kleaner Spray on the THC content of saliva. The results showed that regardless of the mouthwash used, the THC levels detected were well above the detection threshold of saliva tests, calling into question the effectiveness of Kleaner Spray .

On the other hand, experts highlight the physiological and practical limitations linked to the use of the product. The human body continually produces saliva, which means that new traces of THC can be generated even after using the spray. Additionally, factors such as stress and social interactions can influence saliva production, making it difficult to completely eliminate THC .

Additionally, the instructions recommended by the manufacturers of Kleaner Spray may seem unrealistic. They generally recommend making 5 to 10 sprays, swishing the solution around your mouth for 30 seconds, and waiting a few minutes for the product to work. However, experts like Professor Alfred Bernard believe that these instructions do not take into account the continuous production of saliva and the time needed to leave the effects of the spray, particularly during interactions with law enforcement.

Overall, despite manufacturers' claims and aggressive social media marketing, scientific evidence and expert opinions raise serious doubts about whether Kleaner Anti-THC Spray actually works in eliminating THC saliva.

Physiological Limitations of THC Elimination



To understand the challenges associated with eliminating THC from saliva, it is crucial to examine the physiological processes involved in the metabolism of this psychoactive substance. Unlike other toxins, THC has a major particularity: it tends to be stored in the fatty tissues of the human body. This characteristic makes its elimination slower and more complex in regular smokers.

Another important point is the continuous production of saliva by the human body. Saliva is primarily composed of blood plasma and is constantly generated, even after using a spray like Kleaner Anti THC Spray . This continued production means that new traces of THC may be present in saliva even after using the spray, calling into question its long-term effectiveness.

Additionally, the directions for use recommended by Kleaner manufacturers may be unrealistic in real-world situations. Although the instructions suggest waiting a few minutes for the product to work, it is important to note that social interactions and daily activities can influence saliva production. Therefore, even if the spray is used just before a drug test, it may not guarantee complete removal of THC from saliva.

Overall, these physiological limitations highlight the challenges inherent in removing THC from saliva, calling into question the effectiveness of products like Kleaner Anti THC Spray in this task.

Scientific studies on the effectiveness of Kleaner Spray



Independent scientific studies have been conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of Kleaner Anti THC Spray . Among them, a study carried out by researchers from the University of Santiago de Compostela compared the effect of mouth rinsing with different products, including Kleaner , on the THC content of saliva. The results showed that regardless of the solution used, the THC levels detected were well above the detection threshold of saliva tests, calling into question the effectiveness of Kleaner Anti THC Spray .

These results are consistent with reservations expressed by experts such as Professor Alfred Bernard, who highlight the physiological and practical limitations associated with the use of the product. This is because the human body's continued production of saliva makes it difficult to completely eliminate THC , even after using the spray. Additionally, manufacturers' recommended directions for use may seem unrealistic, failing to take into account ongoing saliva production and the time it takes for the product to work.

Overall, scientific studies and expert opinions raise serious doubts about the actual effectiveness of Kleaner Spray Anti THC in removing THC from saliva. These results highlight the importance of conducting rigorous and independent research to evaluate the effectiveness of this type of product, as well as the need for a critical approach in evaluating their potential use.

Perspectives and recommendations



Faced with the mixed results of scientific studies and the reservations expressed by experts regarding the effectiveness of Kleaner Spray Anti THC , it is important to consider appropriate perspectives and recommendations.

First of all, it is crucial to continue scientific research in this area. Additional, independent and rigorous studies are needed to thoroughly evaluate the effectiveness of anti- THC products, including Kleaner . These studies should take into account a variety of factors, such as individual differences in THC metabolism and actual conditions of product use.

Furthermore, it is essential to take a critical approach in evaluating the potential use of anti-THC products , particularly in contexts such as driving under the influence of drugs. Consumers and authorities should be aware of the limitations of these products and consider other methods of detoxification or avoidance of THC before driving.

Finally, it is recommended to increase public awareness of the risks associated with driving under the influence of drugs and the use of products claiming to remove THC from saliva. A better understanding of the effects of THC (cannabis) on cognition and coordination, as well as alternatives to reduce driving risks, is essential to ensure road safety and public health.

In short, continued research, critical vigilance and public awareness are key elements in addressing the question of the effectiveness of anti-THC products such as Kleaner , and in promoting responsible practices regarding driving under the influence of drugs.

Consumer reviews


In addition to scientific studies and expert reviews, reviews from consumers who have tested Kleaner Anti THC Spray can also provide valuable insight into how effective it really is. Some consumers have shared their personal experiences online, often confirming the product's ineffectiveness.

For example, a user shared his experience after using Kleaner Spray on an online forum. Despite following the instructions for use to the letter, including cleaning his teeth beforehand and waiting for more than 15 minutes, he tested positive on a drug test. Others have also expressed disappointment in the product's effectiveness, even suggesting that what they bought might be a low-quality copy.

These testimonials highlight the challenges faced by consumers when trying to evaluate the effectiveness of anti-THC products on the market. The varied personal experiences highlight the need for greater transparency and better regulation in this sector, as well as the importance of independent research to validate manufacturers' claims.

In short, consumer reviews add another dimension to the discussion about the effectiveness of Kleaner Spray Anti THC , shedding light on real-world experiences and challenges encountered in using this type of product.

AMA Prevention Notice

Furthermore, in our experience and with feedback from our many customers who have been able to use our tests after using the sprays, we have seen similar confirmation of the persistent presence of THC in saliva. Our THC or Drugdiag Saliva multi-drug saliva tests, such as those produced by Toda Pharma , have consistently detected the presence of THC , even after application of Kleaner Anti THC sprays . The detection thresholds are similar to those used by law enforcement during traffic stops, raising concerns about how effective these products really are at removing THC from saliva before such testing. It is therefore crucial for consumers to take these observations into account and not rely solely on solutions such as Kleaner Spray to avoid detection of THC during drug tests.

As a saliva test provider, we prefer to favor proactive prevention approaches and consumer responsibility. Rather than looking for workarounds to evade drug testing, we strongly encourage awareness of the risks associated with driving under the influence of drugs and using psychoactive substances. We strongly believe in education about the adverse effects of THC on cognition and coordination, as well as promoting responsible behaviors and healthy lifestyle choices. By adopting a preventative approach, we aim to reduce risks to road safety and public health , while encouraging an open and transparent dialogue about drug use and its consequences.

Conclusion



In conclusion, the evaluation of the effectiveness of Kleaner Spray Anti THC raises important questions regarding its use in saliva detoxification prior to drug testing, particularly in the context of driving. Despite manufacturers' claims and aggressive marketing surrounding this product, scientific evidence and expert opinions call into question its actual effectiveness.

Independent scientific studies have shown mixed results, with THC levels detected in saliva well above saliva test detection limits, even after using Kleaner Spray . Additionally, physiological limitations, such as continuous saliva production and individual variations in THC metabolism, make it difficult to completely eliminate THC from saliva.

In this context, it is essential to adopt a critical approach in evaluating the potential use of Anti THC products , such as Kleaner Spray . Consumers and authorities should be aware of the limitations of these products and consider more reliable alternatives to reduce the risks associated with driving under the influence of drugs.

Finally, continued research, critical vigilance and public awareness are key elements to address the issue of the effectiveness of anti-THC products and to promote responsible practices in road safety and public health.

Back to blog

Leave a comment

Please note, comments need to be approved before they are published.